Unleash Cyber Intelligence Asset Sale - Intelligence Driven Security

Unlock Cyber Intelligence Excellence with Unparalleled Expertise 

Selling individual assets.

About the Sale

Training/Support:

Up to two years transition period with course updates, backend consulting, team trainings and knowledge transfer for all acquired assets.

Reason For Selling:

Time for a change and a prelude to retirement.

Financing:

Seller financing with collateral and 50% down

Learn more

Read the new brief from Treadstone 71. Download it here

A pervasive force distorting public discourse, hampering effective policymaking, and creating fertile ground for exploitation and manipulation.

On November 16, 2016, Oxford Dictionaries declared "post-truth" as its word of the year, highlighting a seismic shift in public discourse. The term saw a staggering 2,000 percent increase in usage between 2015 and 2016, reflecting its emergence as a significant cultural phenomenon. Unlike traditional approaches that might weaken the core and center of truth, post-truth employs a more insidious strategy: it aims to disqualify truth from the outset.

Post-truth strategies operate by attempting to supplant one version of truth with another, often using extensive manipulation and surveillance. The objective here is not to establish an alternate truth but to sow doubt and confusion, muddying the water so people are unsure what to believe. In this environment, any claim to truth becomes equally questionable, leading to cognitive dissonance among the public. Post-truth strategies execute a sophisticated form of deception that does not just bend the truth but replaces it with a fabricated reality. Those who deploy these strategies often leverage advanced methods of manipulation and extensive surveillance capabilities to achieve their aims. The primary objective is not to anchor a new truth but to sow the seeds of doubt and confusion on a grand scale. The tactics blur the lines between fact and fiction so effectively that the public finds it increasingly challenging to discern what to believe. Amid this fog of uncertainty, any statement—no matter its origin or credibility—becomes a point of contention. This atmosphere stokes cognitive dissonance within society, making it hard for individuals to reconcile conflicting information.

To further complicate matters, post-truth maneuvers have a unique way of incorporating dissent and criticism into their narrative fabric. Under the guise of "alternative facts," post-truth tolerates opposing views and gives them space to breathe—only to later reject them. While this may seem paradoxical, it is part of the design. These "alternative facts" often directly oppose one another, creating inherent contradictions that would typically undermine a coherent narrative. However, in the realm of post-truth, these contradictions become assets. They add layers of complexity that further obfuscate the truth, making it even more challenging for the public to navigate the labyrinth of information and disinformation.

Examples:

• 2016 Presidential Election: During the election cycle, claims often eclipsed facts. For example, false information circulated widely on social media platforms, including allegations about candidate Hillary Clinton's involvement in various conspiracies, none of which were substantiated. The spread of such misinformation made it difficult for voters to discern reality, contributing to a post-truth environment.
• COVID-19 Pandemic: The handling of information around COVID-19 has been a breeding ground for post-truth narratives. From the outset, conflicting messages from authorities about the severity of the virus, the effectiveness of masks, and the safety of vaccines have muddled public understanding, leading to confusion and skepticism.
• Climate Change: Despite a scientific consensus on human-caused climate change, campaigns to sow doubt about this reality have been effective. Fossil fuel interests have disseminated misleading studies and false narratives to blur the line between scientific fact and opinion.
• Social Media Echo Chambers: Platforms like Facebook and Twitter have algorithms that create echo chambers, where users only see content that aligns with their pre-existing beliefs. Social Media Echo Chambers have exacerbated the spread of misinformation, making it easier to replace objective truth with emotionally appealing falsehoods.
• "Fake News" as a Discrediting Tool: The term "fake news" itself has become a weapon to delegitimize genuine journalistic efforts. By labeling uncomfortable facts as "fake news," political leaders and public figures can create confusion about reliable sources.
• Racial and Social Injustices: Conversations around racial inequality and systemic injustice often devolve into post-truth debates. Misinformation uses false crime rates, economic indicators, or historical events to create divisive narratives that distract from factual discourse.
• Conspiracy Theories: From QAnon to the "birther" conspiracy about President Obama's place of birth, these widely circulated but unfounded beliefs contribute to a post-truth landscape by replacing verified information with speculative or false narratives.
• Political Polarization: The extreme polarization of American politics encourages post-truth reasoning, where allegiance to a party or individual often trumps objective evaluation of facts. Political Polarization is evident in matters like impeachment proceedings or Supreme Court nominations, where the lines between truth and allegiance blur.
• Science Denial: The rejection of scientific fact in favor of personal or political belief is another manifestation of post-truth, evident in debates over issues like vaccinations, evolution education in schools, and COVID-19 mitigation measures.

This engineered chaos corrodes the foundation of rational discourse. As contradictory "facts" muddy the waters, the societal pursuit of truth becomes futile. The idea that a collective understanding of reality is possible erodes, taking with it the principles fundamental for a functioning democracy and an informed citizenry. In this twisted landscape, the likelihood of arriving at a consensus on what is true diminishes, and the belief that such a consensus could exist also begins to wane. The outcome is a societal climate fraught with doubt, skepticism, and a broken compass for discerning truth, leaving populations vulnerable to further manipulation and control.

Post-truth also accommodates dissent and criticism in a cunning maneuver by simultaneously rejecting "alternative facts." The dissent and criticism are paradoxical because these alternative facts often contradict each other. Yet, the post-truth paradigm thrives on such contradictions, as they further contribute to public doubt and confusion. The result is a landscape where rational discourse suffers, and the possibility of reaching a consensus understanding of truth becomes increasingly remote.

By actively fostering an environment of skepticism, post-truth makes it difficult to challenge falsehoods effectively. People become disoriented, finding it increasingly challenging to differentiate between genuine facts and manipulated information. As truth becomes a disputed territory, the stage is set for manipulation on an unprecedented scale, affecting everything from elections and public policy to social relationships and individual beliefs. By deliberately nurturing a culture of skepticism, post-truth disempowers individuals and communities from effectively challenging false claims. The resulting atmosphere of confusion leaves people struggling to distinguish authentic information from manipulated narratives. What were once clear distinctions between truth and falsehood become blurred, and truth becomes an arena for power plays and manipulative tactics. In this bewildering environment, the opportunity for deceit scales to an entirely new level, with far-reaching implications that ripple across all aspects of society. This far reach includes the electoral process, the formation and execution of public policy, social interactions, and even the core beliefs that individuals hold dear.

But post-truth's ambition does not stop at warping our immediate perceptions of reality; it seeks to destroy the structures that enable us to identify what is true. It is an assault not merely on language but also on the psychological underpinnings guiding our understanding of the world. This warping extends its tendrils into the political realm, tearing at the fabric of democratic institutions that rely on an informed citizenry. Ultimately, it creates a society where the pursuit of objective truth degenerates into a futile game of illusions, where facts are as mutable as quicksand and as elusive as smoke.

Post-truth is not a passive player in this scenario but an active force with a multifaceted impact. It disorients our cognitive faculties, corrupts the political dialogue, and destabilizes social harmony. As it permeates these various layers of society, it also changes the rules of engagement. It turns the quest for objective truth into a complex maze of falsehoods and half-truths, designed to lead us astray rather than toward understanding. The ultimate tragedy here is that post-truth does not just obscure the path to objective reality; it erases the notion that such a path could exist, leaving society wandering in a self-perpetuating fog of confusion and vulnerability.

Post-truth does not merely distort our perception of reality; it aims to dismantle the framework by which we discern truth. Its impact extends beyond language and enters the realms of psychology, politics, and society, effectively turning the quest for objective truth into a game of smoke and mirrors.

If you are tired of the same old threat intelligence feeds and looking to save time on risk mitigation, data collection, and validation, Treadstone 71's training is the answer. Do you want to stop spending a fortune on other vendors' generic data? Are you ready to elevate your team's cyber intelligence expertise? We will guide you through AI tool installation and usage, allowing you to manage your curated data without outsourcing.

Treadstone 71 is a cyber intelligence company that provides training, consulting, and content to help organizations protect themselves from cyber threats. Intelligence professionals consider Treadstone 71 as one of the first and best cyber intelligence companies in the world:

• Expertise: Treadstone 71’s intelligence professionals have a deep understanding of the cyber threat landscape. They have a proven track record of helping organizations protect themselves from cyber-attacks.
• Training: Treadstone 71 offers a variety of training courses that cover all aspects of cyber intelligence, from threat analysis to incident response. Their training is highly practical and pragmatic while being innovative. The courses are hands-on, and designed to help organizations build the skills they need to estimate adversary actions while protecting themselves from cyber threats.
• Consulting: Treadstone 71 offers consulting services to help organizations assess their cyber risk and develop a plan to mitigate those risks. Their consultants have a deep understanding of the cyber threat landscape, and they can help organizations implement the right security controls to protect themselves.
• Content: Treadstone 71 publishes a variety of content, including blog posts, white papers, and webinars, which covers all aspects of cyber intelligence. Treadstone 71 content helps organizations stay up to date on the latest cyber threats and learn how to protect themselves.

In addition to these factors, Treadstone 71 is also known for its commitment to quality and customer service. They are constantly investing in their training programs and consulting services to ensure that they are providing the best possible value to their clients.

As a result of these factors, the industry considers Treadstone 71 one of the best cyber intelligence companies in the world. They are a trusted advisor to organizations of all sizes, and they are committed to helping them protect themselves from cyber threats.

1. Cyber Intelligence Tradecraft: This is training in various elements of cyber intelligence, like OSINT (Open-Source Intelligence), HUMINT (Human Intelligence), SOCMINT (Social Media Intelligence), and more.
2. Strategic Intelligence Analysis: Providing analysis on a strategic level to help businesses understand and combat cyber threats.
3. Cyber Threat Intelligence Program Development: Assisting organizations in building a structured, formal cyber threat intelligence program.
4. Cyber Intelligence Lifecycle management: Overseeing the process of gathering, analyzing, and applying Cyber intelligence.
5. Research and analysis: Including targeted research on specific threats, threat actors, vulnerabilities, and other aspects of cybersecurity.
6. Cyber CounterIntelligence Strategies and Tactics: Assisting organizations in implementing strategies to counteract cyber threats.
7. Cognitive Warfare Training and Consulting. Cyber Psyops: Discover, collect, analyze and deliver actionable intelligence on adversary operations.

1. Corporations and Enterprises: Large businesses often have significant cybersecurity needs. They may purchase Treadstone 71's services to bolster their security defenses, develop internal cybersecurity capabilities, or gain insight into potential threats.
2. Government Agencies: These entities often need to protect sensitive data and systems. They may use Treadstone 71's services to improve their defensive capabilities, develop counterintelligence strategies, or gather information on potential threats.
3. Cybersecurity Professionals: Individuals working in the field of cybersecurity may purchase Treadstone 71's training to improve their skills, keep up to date with the latest threats and strategies, or gain a competitive edge in their career.
4. Academic Institutions: Universities and colleges with a focus on cybersecurity might also be interested in Treadstone 71's services, either to supplement their own curricula or to provide continuing education opportunities for their faculty.
5. Technology Firms: Tech companies, especially those handling substantial amounts of user data or providing online services, may need Treadstone 71's services to ensure they are protecting their systems and user data appropriately.
6. Healthcare Organizations: Given the sensitivity and value of healthcare data, these organizations could benefit from Treadstone 71's expertise in cybersecurity to safeguard their systems.

Benefits of engaging Treadstone 71:

• Increased cyber awareness: Treadstone 71's training courses will help employees to understand the cyber threat landscape and how to identify and avoid cyber threats.
• Improved threat analysis: Treadstone 71's consulting services can help organizations to assess their cyber risk and develop a plan to mitigate those risks.
• Enhanced incident response: Treadstone 71's consulting services can help organizations to develop a plan to respond to cyber incidents.
• Increased operational efficiency: Treadstone 71's training and consulting services help organizations improve their operational efficiency by reducing the time and resources required to estimate and prevent cyber threats.

Overall, there are several reasons why any organization should buy Treadstone 71 services and training. Treadstone 71 is a well-respected company with a compelling reputation for quality and customer service. We offer a variety of training courses and consulting services tailored to the specific needs of critical infrastructure organizations. By working with Treadstone 71, your organization can increase their cyber awareness, improve their threat analysis, enhance their incident response, and increase their operational efficiency.

FROM CYBER GREY ZONE ACTIONS TO ASSASSINATIONS – PMOI IN THE CROSSHAIRS.

The following is an overview of Iranian regime tactics, techniques, and methods used against dissidents and opposition groups. The People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI) holds a Free Iran conference every summer. Every year, the Iranian regime works to discredit, disrupt, delay, and destroy any attempts at the PMOI to hold the conference. From physical threats to the hacking of foreign governments to political pressure because of prisoner exchanges, Iran uses any tactic available to push the envelope during each action. Iran continues these actions.

Cyber grey zone actions blur the line between acceptable state behavior and hostile acts, creating challenges for attribution, response, and establishing clear norms and rules in the cyber domain. Addressing these challenges requires international cooperation, robust cybersecurity measures, and the development of norms and agreements to regulate state behavior in cyberspace.

Iranian cyber grey zone activities refer to malicious actions in cyberspace that fall short of a full-fledged cyberattack but aim to achieve strategic objectives.

If you really want to enhance your cyber intelligence beyond mere cyber hygiene, free yourselves from useless threat intelligence feeds, and significantly reduce your risk, collection times, and data validation efforts, then Treadstone 71 intelligence training is for you. Should you wish to continue to perform cyber hygiene activities while pouring your hard earned budget into $8k technical classes that bear little fruit, then do not take our courses. If you want to take your team to the next level of expertise in cyber intelligence, while weaning yourself off of someone elses high-priced generic data and information, then look to Treadstone 71.

Students will use virtual machines, download, and install ChatGPT, training the AI module on their data stores, and incorporate updated content during hands-on course case studies.

Learn more about our online Short Courses

Why pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for a vendors ChatGPT install over their controlled data that is not geared to you? We take you through the installation and use AI tools preparing you configure and training ChatGPT tools over your hard currated data. Stop paying someone else for what you can do.

What is cognitive war?

Cognitive warfare is a type of warfare that targets the mind, beliefs, and perceptions of individuals or groups. It involves the use of various tactics such as propaganda, disinformation, psychological manipulation (cyber psyops), and other forms of influence to shape the opinions and behaviors of the target audience.

Cognitive warfare can be difficult to recognize as it often runs through subtle and indirect means. Signs that cognitive warfare may be occurring include:

1. The spread of false or misleading information through social media or other channels.
2. The use of emotionally charged language or imagery to influence public opinion.
3. The promotion of extreme or polarizing views designed to create division and conflict.
4. The use of fear or intimidation to control or manipulate individuals or groups.

To recognize cognitive warfare, it is important to stay informed and be critical of the information presented to you. Look for multiple sources of information, fact-check claims, and be aware of your own biases and assumptions. By staying vigilant and informed, we can better protect ourselves and our communities from the harmful effects of cognitive warfare.

Russia

There have been numerous reports and allegations of Russia using cyber psychological operations against the United States in recent years. Some of the tactics that have been attributed to Russia include:

1. Social media manipulation: Russian operatives use social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to spread false or misleading information, sow discord, and amplify divisive issues. They also create fake accounts and personas to manipulate public opinion.
2. Hacking and data leaks: Russian hackers target political parties, government agencies, and other organizations in the United States to steal sensitive information and release it to the public. Russia uses leaks to embarrass or discredit individuals or organizations or to influence public opinion.
3. Disinformation campaigns: Russian operatives spread false or misleading information through traditional media channels like television, radio, and online sources. This can include spreading conspiracy theories, promoting extremist views, and distorting the facts to suit their agenda.
4. Cyber-attacks: Russian hackers launch cyber-attacks against critical infrastructure in the United States, such as power grids and water treatment facilities. These attacks disrupt services, cause damage, and create chaos.

Russian Cognitive and Information Warfare Short Course Section 1

Russian Cognitive and Information Warfare Short Course Section 2 - Information Alibi

It is important to note that while there have been numerous allegations of Russian cyber psychological operations against the United States, not all these allegations have been proven. However, cyber psychological operations are a growing concern in today's interconnected world, and it is important for individuals and organizations to be aware of the risks and take steps to protect themselves.

China

China use psychological operations (PSYOPs) against the United States in several ways. The tactics attributed to China include:

1. Cyber espionage: Chinese hackers steal sensitive information from US government agencies and private companies. This information gains an advantage in negotiations or in developing innovative technologies.
2. Propaganda: China uses state-controlled media to spread propaganda and influence public opinion in the United States. This can include promoting a positive image of China, downplaying human rights abuses, and criticizing US policies.
3. Influence operations: Chinese operatives uses social media platforms to influence public opinion in the United States. This can include creating fake accounts and personas to spread false or misleading information and amplifying divisive issues to sow discord.
4. Economic coercion: China uses economic coercion to influence US policy decisions. This can include threatening withholding trade or investment or using economic incentives to encourage certain actions.

Iran

Iran has been known to use influence operations against dissidents domestically and abroad. The tactics attributed to Iran include:

1. Cyber espionage: Iranian hackers use phishing attacks and other tactics to steal sensitive information from dissidents and opposition groups. This information finds and targets individuals who are critical of the Iranian government.
2. Propaganda: Iran uses state-controlled media to spread propaganda and influence public opinion. This can include promoting a positive image of the Iranian government, downplaying human rights abuses, and criticizing opposition groups.
3. Surveillance and harassment: Iranian security forces use surveillance and harassment to intimidate dissidents and opposition groups. This can include monitoring phone calls, emails, and social media accounts and detaining and interrogating individuals who are critical of the government.
4. Disinformation campaigns: Iranian operatives spread false or misleading information through social media and other channels to discredit dissidents and opposition groups. This can include spreading rumors, creating fake news stories, and using bots to amplify certain messages.

We see several methods of cognitive war in the United States. The most common tactics include:

1. Disinformation: The spread of false or misleading information through social media, traditional media, and other channels. This can include conspiracy theories, fake news stories, and other forms of propaganda.
2. Social media manipulation: The use of social media platforms to spread disinformation, amplify divisive issues, and sow discord. This can include using bots and fake accounts to manipulate public opinion.
3. Polarization: Promoting extreme or polarizing views creates division and conflict. This can include the use of emotionally charged language, the demonization of opposing views, and the promotion of conspiracy theories.
4. Psychological manipulation: The use of psychological tactics to influence public opinion and behavior. This can include using fear, anger, and other emotions to manipulate individuals and groups.
5. Hacking and cyber-attacks: The use of hacking and cyber-attacks to steal sensitive information, disrupt services, and cause damage. This can include attacks on critical infrastructure, government agencies, and private companies.

Important to note

While these methods of cognitive war are often associated with foreign actors, domestic groups and individuals also use them. Individuals and organizations should be aware of the risks and take steps to protect themselves from the harmful effects of cognitive war.

• Admiralty Scoring Model Evidence Verification Automation - AI
• Analyzing Targeted Cyber-HUMINT - A Short How To
• Automating Cyber Intelligence Analysis
• Automating Intelligence Source Verification
• Developing Automated Report-Generation Capabilities
• Integrating and automating SATs - Structured Analytic Techniques
• Regularly Evaluate Algorithm Performance for Report Generation and Automation
• Speeding the intelligence analysis peer review process with AI
• STEMPLES Plus as a Framework to Assess Cyber Capabilities